After the Bill Clinton presidency, the Democratic Party lost the White House, the Congress, the majority of the State House, state legislatures and was cast out into the political wilderness. With unchecked Republican power we have seen the unraveling of America.
Why would we want a Restoration of the House of Clinton?
What was worse is what President Bill Clinton actually did do with those eight precious years in the White House?
There were no health care initiatives.
There were no campaign finance reforms or voting rights initiatives that would have prevented the 2000 fiasco.
There were no landmark programs or anything of a legacy except a bubble economy and a Republican majority.
So, what did he accomplish?
The Defense of Marriage Act, allowing states to refuse recognition of certain same-sex marriages, and defined marriage as between a male and female for purposes of federal law.
The Telecom Reform Act, eliminating major ownership restrictions for radio and television groups.
The Iraq Liberation Act, stating of policy of regime change in Iraq.
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, promising to "end welfare as we know it" but tinged with misogyny and racism (welfare queen) in its promotion.
The "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, discriminating against homosexuals in the military.
The North American Free Trade Agreement.
China Most Favored Nation trade agreement.
And much more. More inline with the Republicans than the Democrats.
It was Bill Clinton's policies that gave reason to Ralph Nader's run in 2000.
So, would such a great legacy why would Democrats even consider restoring the House of Clinton?
|
|
|
Permalink :: 65 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.